Eleven road scholars arrived at the northern end of Dalton
Road and took up residence at the Aurora Hotel, the only 4-star in
Deadhorse. They ate everything on the
large banquet table, and then trucked on to examine WHAT (What Holds America Together):
Jack: I enjoyed it primarily because it reminded me
of our family’s Road Adventures – it inspired me to press on. Not a classic, but a lot of fun. B+
Dick J: Same grade; the author writes well, but did
not follow through on his stated purpose.
My mind wanders as he writes – where will he go next? The best part was what was perhaps made
up: the conflict in Anacortes. B+
Rob E: I liked it a lot. I especially enjoy the Great Plains more than
the Rockies. It makes me want to go back
and drive them again. I like the travel
books: Blue Highways (traveling on the back roads) is very good. There was some expose not too long ago that a
good portion of Travels With Charlie
was made up. But the story of the black
kid walking through a white school and receiving all the taunts hit me
strong. I liked the stories; the author
was cynically looking for angry people. I give it an A- for memories.
Dick Arms: First, that is an interesting concept: what holds America together? The author came across as very negative – not
the same politics as mine. His writing
was passable, not great. I presented
this idea at Toastmasters, and got better ideas. America is unique – a unique political system
or a belief system – and a Constitution.
Caputo didn’t hit on that idea. B- Just a travel book.
Bob Woods: To begin with, I don’t like driving long
distances. The book is harmless enough. “What Holds America Together’ is just an
excuse. B+
Mike: Why do we read? I think to learn, and to entertain
ourselves. This book had both. I enjoyed what the author had to teach about
places, cultures, people. I was
entertained by the on-going post 9-11 street corner in Anacortes, WA. Does an excellent job of his descriptions,
always something new. A
Charlie: This guy is any writer, who took a vacation,
wrote about it – didn’t get his goal, lightweight: C
Ken G: I found it often tedious and boring, other
times interesting and humorous. Not any
profound conclusion as to WHAT. B-
Bob S: I have the same feeling about the
premise: he didn’t analyze why America
holds together. The other part I didn’t
care for: Kit Carson was an active participant
in history; Jack Kerouac was an active participant in our Culture – he defined
the beat generation and the hippie generation.
It’s true, this was a charming book, well written. I didn’t find it illuminating. It did not have gravitas or significance. B
Keith: I already mentioned that the author failed
his mission. C
Here is mine:
Ron Bousek: There was a lack of summary but he reported
what he found. I liked the road trip
with some history along the way. What
holds the country together (as defined by Erika at the end) was Hope – hope that
things that are bad will get better. The
writing was not first rate. A-
... and here is what the author said about his own book:
I think you’ll find The Longest Road very different from A Rumor of War. It’s a semi-serious, semi-light-hearted travelogue. It doesn’t provide an answer to the question, What holds this vast, diverse country together. But it presents the thoughts that the people I met along the way have on that issue.
... and here is what the author said about his own book:
I think you’ll find The Longest Road very different from A Rumor of War. It’s a semi-serious, semi-light-hearted travelogue. It doesn’t provide an answer to the question, What holds this vast, diverse country together. But it presents the thoughts that the people I met along the way have on that issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment