Friday, April 29, 2016

The Life We Bury by Allen Eskens

Nine autistic detectives gathered in the shadow of Cabezon Peak to munch popcorn, sit on Frida, and await para Leon while they discussed hard copy accessibility, Islamic pirates, safety latches on the inside of car trunks, stereotyped drunken mothers, and the response time of police sharpshooters.  Some of their observations were captured on a small hand-held recorder:

Dick Jensen:  I liked the story, I liked the characters, I liked the writing.  An easy read, but the last part ruined it for me:  when the sharpshooter shot the guy in the head and everyone lived happily ever after.  B+

Rob E:  I second all of that – the author wrapped it up too much.  B

Dick Arms:  I was greatly bothered by the coincidences and contrivances.  How did the cops get there so suddenly?  B

Charlie:  Good first effort.  Don’t give up your day job.  B

Ron B:  I give it an A for Entertainment, a B+ for crafting the story.  A good adventure/mystery:  A-

Bob Woods:  I read some, hated it.

Ken Gillen:  Predicable but a page turner.  Enjoyed it!  B+

Mike:  Maybe it had some good parts. Maybe it has some well-written metaphors.  Maybe I learned how to perform a wristlock takedown.  Maybe the code should have been worked on a bit more.  Maybe Carl didn’t have to die the night after he found out he had received exoneration.  Maybe this is a B.


Jack Farrell:  I enjoyed this first novel.  Obviously not great literary work, but I thought it would be a great book to take to the beach.  It did remind me of a John Grisham novel:  engaging, direct, clean.  A page turner.  The characters were not really complex, but not flat either.  B+

Saturday, March 26, 2016

Flashman & The Tiger by George Macdonald Fraser


Eight former sergeants of the Border Regiment gathered in the pre-dawn Burma sunlight to review the Sacred Relics of G.M. Fraser, discuss the relationship of Flashman to James Bond, and consider how even fictional cowards and bullies can change the world for the good – or at least for the Victorian Cross.  One by one the troopers took one step forward, saluted smartly, and had their say:

Bob Woods:   What I find most appealing in the Flashman Papers is that the author takes a specific incident and researches the heck out of it.  His meticulous research had me convinced that he was a historian who turned to writing fiction, but as it turns out, he is a journalist who loves research.  A-

Keith:  Looking for a concise summary of Flashman:  Casanova; Lady Killer; rake; rouĂ©; wolf; woman chaser.  50 pages is plenty for me; however, the ending was superb.  Dynamic action is good in the short run.   Hearing 40 minutes of Rush Limbaugh gives you knowledge of what 4 hours will be like.  B-

Kenny G:  This is my first Flashman book.  I read “Flashman & The Tiger” story first and thought it clever to mix history and fiction.  B+ for that story.   However, the Baccarat story was overdrawn, turned me off:  C+   Overall:  B-

Bob Simon:  I read the first and last story, not the one about Baccarat.  I enjoyed the ending to the first story, thought it clever:  A-  I loved the energy of the story – invigorating.  Even humorous writers don’t have this energy.  Good ol’ Flashy goes in, gets the woman, fights his way out – wild!  He saves Franz Joseph from being assassinated, gets high commendations.  Interesting, but not sure I would recommend to others.  Charming, a genre I’m not familiar with.  I don’t know how Fraser animates his artistic genre.  A-

Charlie:  Fun and entertaining, I enjoyed reading it.  Doesn’t compare well with Western Literature.  Doesn’t make it to the top level – very good, but B overall.  Good fun.

Dick Arms:  I enjoyed it.  I read the first part, then learned I was supposed to read the third part.  Very skillfully written, excellent grasp of history, loved where he was idololizing his granddaughter only to discover that she had his same sense of morals.  Skillfully done, probably not tell all my friends to read it.  A-

Mike:  If the twin goals of reading are for entertainment and to learn, this was a top-notch book.  I am always amazed with how little of human history I know.  Especially entertaining to read Flashman on a Kindle iPad app.  
Here one can click on words like Isandl'wana and impi, and people like Cetshwayo and Lord Chelmsford to try to ascertain:  are these fictional or real?  Great mixture of both, and I subsequently learned a great deal.  My thanks to Brother Simon for introducing me to the movie "Zulu" – at YouTube.com, a search for Zulu chants brings 6 minutes of unforgettable video.  A-

… and from well outside of Zululand …

Dear Bob,

Sorry I won't be able to join in the conversation on Thursday.  We will be RVing in northern Arizona far from the threat of Hungarian fanatics, Gordon-Cumming, and Zulus.

I purchased the First Anchor Books 1999 edition of Flashman and the Tiger and read all three extracts.  I did not enjoy "The Subtleties of Baccarat" as much as I did "The Road to Charring Cross" and "Flashman and the Tiger."  These were the first works by George MacDonald Fraser I had ever read.  I enjoyed them very much.  They were fun, if not alway funny--British humor doesn't always tickle my fancy.  Harry Flashman is a protagonist I had difficulty identifying with (still trying to imagine a cowardly Indiana Jones or James Bond), but GMF was successful in keeping me in suspense in every one of Sir Harry's adventures.  A-

Regards,

Jack


Bob and Mike:
I will not be at the meeting tonight.
Here is my brief review of the book.
I enjoyed reading Flashman and The Tiger,  I think it was quite well written and I found the characters interesting--the story was also quite interesting.  I planned to read more stories about Flashman (the book that I bought has two more stories in it) but I was not able to read them--we have been out of town on a cruise.
I don't think this story was quite as good as some of the previous ones that we have read so I would give it a B.


Sorry to miss the meeting.
Dick Jensen

The first Flashman tale we read [2000] led me to regard the hero as a lovable scalawag.  I didn't think our hero was very lovable in this Tiger tale.  Closer to loathsome.  Glad it was short.

C plus.  The plus is for brevity.

Rob

Sunday, February 28, 2016

Divided or United? by LTBC Poet laureate, Prof. Keith Gilbert


Our Nation of some 325 Million
are deeply divided on many issues …
So, are we still a United States?

Our Nation is a curious quilt … indeed,
An amalgam of multiply-cultured
Colored threads … interwoven into a
Sinewy, random pattern…

Our Quilt is so spectrally & spiritually
In-homogeneous as to defy description …but
Note:  our quilt has a triad of Unique Properties

                Our tightly-woven fabric is super strong,
                Yielding warmth & security to its People …
                Yet our Quilt is replete with wrinkles …
                                - Prodigious power & wealth of the 1%
                                - Ubiquitous drugs & crime
                                - unabated conflicts with far-flung “enemies,” etc

             But note … an obvious foible in our Quilt is
             A gaping hole at its center – indeed,
             Our beautiful Quilt is so polarized that
             It has no center!

So, pray tell, what elixirs bend our Quilt?
Again, we enjoy three powerful epoxies …
Faith, Freedom, & Hope …

1)       Our Nation is one of Formidable Faith …
   A Superior Being provides a Radiant Laser
   To guide & nurture us
2)      Our Constitution ensures enduring Freedoms,
   Including Speech, Religion, Press, Petition, and
   The Right to Bear Arms
3)      Our Faith & Liberties Engender Hope …
  Belief in a Chance to Live a good Life
  And seek a better one

So this is why our Unique Quilt unites us
even without a Center
due to Extreme Political Polarization

Yet the Tenacious trio of Goods -
Our Faith & Indelible Freedoms engender
Patriotism and enable Hope.

Though our Nation will continue to debate
Much, the enduring Health and Strength of our
Uniquely-woven Quilt assures we
Will forever remain United.


-          K. Gilbert, Jan 2016

The Longest Road by Philip Caputo

Eleven road scholars arrived at the northern end of Dalton Road and took up residence at the Aurora Hotel, the only 4-star in Deadhorse.  They ate everything on the large banquet table, and then trucked on to examine WHAT (What Holds America Together):

Jack:  I enjoyed it primarily because it reminded me of our family’s Road Adventures – it inspired me to press on.  Not a classic, but a lot of fun.  B+

Dick J:  Same grade; the author writes well, but did not follow through on his stated purpose.  My mind wanders as he writes – where will he go next?  The best part was what was perhaps made up:  the conflict in Anacortes.  B+

Rob E:  I liked it a lot.  I especially enjoy the Great Plains more than the Rockies.  It makes me want to go back and drive them again.  I like the travel books:  Blue Highways (traveling on the back roads) is very good.  There was some expose not too long ago that a good portion of Travels With Charlie was made up.  But the story of the black kid walking through a white school and receiving all the taunts hit me strong.  I liked the stories; the author was cynically looking for angry people. I give it an A- for memories.

Dick Arms:  First, that is an interesting concept:  what holds America together?  The author came across as very negative – not the same politics as mine.  His writing was passable, not great.  I presented this idea at Toastmasters, and got better ideas.  America is unique – a unique political system or a belief system – and a Constitution.  Caputo didn’t hit on that idea.  B-  Just a travel book.

Bob Woods:  To begin with, I don’t like driving long distances.  The book is harmless enough.  “What Holds America Together’ is just an excuse.  B+

Mike:  Why do we read?  I think to learn, and to entertain ourselves.  This book had both.  I enjoyed what the author had to teach about places, cultures, people.  I was entertained by the on-going post 9-11 street corner in Anacortes, WA.  Does an excellent job of his descriptions, always something new.  A

Charlie:  This guy is any writer, who took a vacation, wrote about it – didn’t get his goal, lightweight:  C

Ken G:  I found it often tedious and boring, other times interesting and humorous.  Not any profound conclusion as to WHAT.  B-

Bob S:  I have the same feeling about the premise:  he didn’t analyze why America holds together.  The other part I didn’t care for:  Kit Carson was an active participant in history; Jack Kerouac was an active participant in our Culture – he defined the beat generation and the hippie generation.  It’s true, this was a charming book, well written.  I didn’t find it illuminating.  It did not have gravitas or significance.  B 

Keith:  I already mentioned that the author failed his mission.  C  Here is mine:


Ron Bousek:  There was a lack of summary but he reported what he found.  I liked the road trip with some history along the way.  What holds the country together (as defined by Erika at the end) was Hope – hope that things that are bad will get better.  The writing was not first rate.  A-

... and here is what the author said about his own book:  
I think you’ll find The Longest Road very different from A Rumor of War. It’s a semi-serious, semi-light-hearted travelogue. It doesn’t provide an answer to the question, What holds this vast, diverse country together. But it presents the thoughts that the people I met along the way have on that issue. 

Friday, January 22, 2016

Bemerkungen: All The Light We Cannot See

What are the defining moments in our lives?  Nine revenants from the once-proud collection of USA war (and pre-war) babies gathered at the Private Rosch Memorial to discuss WW II, WW I, and 2014.  Is it not true that The Great Depression and World War II were the defining events for our parents' lives, and thus directly molded our lives?  What was to like, what was not to like about Anthony Doerr’s tome of young Werner and younger Marie-Laure?  Why do we read?  The revenants spoke their peace:

Charlie:  I really enjoyed the book, and give it an A.  The characters were well developed.  I read it slowly, so as not to miss any of the beauty.  Not as long as the page count indicates, with big print, lots of white space.

Mike:  Why do we read?  I think we read:  1) to learn, and 2) to entertain ourselves.  Both of those objectives are admittedly subjective, but I found that this book worked well for me on both those levels.  Yes, there was some plot contrivance, and yes, some was predictable (didn’t you just know that Sgt Major Rumpel was going to die from his cancer the moment he achieved the Sea of Flames?), but hey, a good A book.  I loved the way Werner was ‘discovered’ for his radio repair talents – makes me think of how many geniuses have been born and died without having come to the forefront of human achievement. 

Ron Bousek:   Let me read to you from the last chapter [2014]:  old people, young people (page 529).  The grandson’s games on the computer, his moped.  The electromagnetic waves are indeed within the light we cannot see.  I give it an A.  Well written, I liked the short chapters.

Bob Woods:  I would give it an A.  Unusual book, interesting job of organizing.  Sympathetic characters.  Up until the 50s or early 60s, ham radio enthusiasts would create their own equipment.  The author understood about radio and electronics.  Refreshing – A

Ken Gillen:  I thought it was a well written book – interesting story line, interesting characters.  Some frustration with the back and forth (to and from August 8, 1944), but overall A

Rob E:  I violated my own rules:  I read the blurbs on the back before reading the book.  I read it mostly this week, mostly in the last 48 hours, somewhat superficially.  I got wrapped up in it and enjoyed it.  I didn’t mind the jumping around.  Still hurrying to read late this afternoon.  I liked it a lot – creative.  It justifies the blurbs on the back cover.  I’ll go along with the group:  A

Dick Arms:  Sounds like we’re all on the same page [529].  I had no trouble with the jumping around.  I was impressed with the writing.  The descriptions were tremendous, and the way he got into the young girl’s mind.  This young author [42] is going places.  I like the short chapters which read as vignettes.  Skillfully done:  A

Keith:  I didn’t get a copy of the book.  I’m looking into the paranormal and magnetic therapy.  I’ve made some headbands that help me sleep.  Charlie will tell you we have a pineal gland in our brain that produces the melatonin to help us sleep, and the magnetic fields may affect this.  After being besieged by about 25 beautiful women, I’m creating more of these headbands.

Dick Jensen:  I read this book when it first came out, and read it again last week.  I loved it the first time, and equally the second.  A great story, characters.  I give it an A or A+.  The dessert is from the Swiss Alps Bakery on San Pedro at Candelaria.

... and from well outside of Saint-Malo:


Dear Dick,

I am so sorry I won't be able to join the discussion of your book choice next week.  It should be a fascinating discussion of a haunting story.  I am in Southeast Asia and will be in Da Nang on Thursday probably looking for what was once known as China Beach. 

I found ALL THE LIGHT WE CANNOT SEE very engaging and one of the best books we have read in a long time.  The novel reflected an exceptional depth of knowledge of place, time and human nature.  I was taken in by the strength of Marie-Laure's character just as her great-uncle Etienne was and wondered about my own moral strength when reading about how Werner struggled when he faced his dilemmas.  Doerr’s ability as a writer is exceptional.  He is a true craftsman in the way he uses the language.  I found his descriptions of places and people and his metaphors and analogies very powerful.  I thoroughly enjoyed it and will recommend it highly to my friends.  A
Warm regards,

Jack


Dear Dick:
I will again find myself drinking wine instead in Taos instead of engaging in stimulating conversation with you on Thursday.
I enjoyed the book very much after I got used to the tennis match swings of the plot organization.  I liked the poetics of Doerr as well as his insight into human nature. Rather like "How Green was My Valley" in feel, temperament, and poetic quality,
Unfortunately, the plot dealt with coming of age as a Nazi rather than in the Welsh coal fields, so not my favorite era.  I don't need to be reminded of how brutishly cruel the Nazis were.  I have been told and seen enough stories to fill a hundred books of horror stories.
I also realized that there was some method to in the initially maddening plot shifts from one character to another and one location to another location.  Sort of like a Shakespeare play on steroids with an ending like Thomas Hardy's, where all the plot lines merge into a glorious finish.
I give it an A-.
Cheers,
Bob

Related source material highly recommended by members:
Inline image 1  The German War:  A Nation Under Arms by Nicholas Stargardt (704 pages, of which the last 50 or so consists of bibliography and index; includes many maps).  $21.60 hardcopy, $19.25 for Kindle.
Inline image 3Stalingrad: The Fateful Siege 1942-1943 by Antony Beevor;(1999; 528 pages). $15.26 paperback, $16.99 Kindle 
FĂĽhrer & The Fog by Poetlaureate, Last Thursday Book Club.  Epic poem (2001; 1 page).  Members can read for free here.


Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Struktur: All The Light We Cannot See


The brain is locked in total darkness of course, children, says the voice. It floats in a clear liquid inside the skull, never in the light. And yet the world it constructs in the mind is full of light. It brims with color and movement. So how, children, does the brain, which lives without a spark of light, build for us a world full of light?

"Fragen Sie nicht, was die Struktur fĂĽr den Einzelnen tun kann. Fragen Sie, was der Einzelne fĂĽr die Jungenschaft." - Chapterman, 8 August 1939


                        Aufbau des Buches:
Zero – 7 August 1944
Leaflets (0.3 pages)
Bombers (0.5 pages)
The Girl  (1.5 pages)
The Boy (2.1 pages)
Saint-Malo  (1.6 pages)
Number 4 rue Vauborel (1.2 pages)
Cellar  (1.7 pages)
Bombs Away (1 page)

One – 1934
Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (4.5 pages)
Zolverein (3 pages)
Key Pound (4.3 pages)
Radio  (2.1 pages – Werner)
Take Us Home (2.1 pages – Marie-Laure)
Something Rising (2 pages – Werner)
page 40:  Light (2 pages – Marie-Laure)
One Flag Flutters Before Us  (2 pages – Werner)
Around The World in Eighty Days (2.7 pages – Marie)
The Professor  (2.1 pages – Werner)
page 50:  Sea of Flames (3 pages – Marie)
Open Your Eyes  (1.4 pages – Werner)
page 55:  Fade (1.4 pages – Marie-Laure)
The Principles of Mechanics  (2 pages – Werner)
page 59:  Rumors (2.1 pages – Marie-Laure)
Bigger Faster Brighter  (2.5 pages – Werner – State Youth)
page 65:  Mark of the Beast (1.8 pages – Marie-Laure – Nov 1939)
***page 67:  (untitled letter to the professor)  (1 page – Werner; letter by Jutta)
page 68:  Good evening.  Or Heil Hitler if You Prefer(1.4 pages – Werner)
page 70:  Bye-bye, Blind Girl (2.5 pages – Marie-Laure)
Making Socks(1.1 pages – Werner)
page 75:  Flight (4.2 pages – Marie-Laure – hoping for a train)
Herr Seidler (7 pages – Werner)
page 87:  Exodus (4.2 pages – Marie-Laure)

Two – 8 August 1944
Page 95:  Saint-Malo  (1 page)
Number 4 rue Vauborel (1.2 pages)
Hotel of Bees  (1.4 pages - Werner)
Down Six Flights (1.7 pages - Marie-Laure)
Trapped (1.6 pages – Werner)

Three – June 1940
Page 107:  Chateau  (4.6 pages)
Entrance Exam (4.6 pages – Werner)
Brittany  (2.1 pages - Marie-Laure)
* Madame Manec  (2.3 pages - Marie-Laure)
You Have Been Called (2.8 pages – Werner)
Occuper  (4.8 pages - Marie-Laure)
Don’t Tell Lies (3 pages – Werner)
Etienne  (2.4 pages - Marie-Laure)
Jungmanner (3.5 pages – Werner)
**Vienna  (2.5 pages – von Rumpel)
The Boches (3.1 pages – Marie-Laure)
Hauptmann (1.6 pages – Werner)
Flying Couch (2 pages – Marie-Laure)
The Sum of Angles (3.8 pages – Werner)
The Professor (5.3 pages – Marie-Laure)
Page 162:  (untitled, censored letters to Jutta)  (2 pages – Werner)
Perfumer (2 pages – Big Claude [Marie-Laure])
Time of the Ostriches (1.7 pages – Big Claude [Marie-Laure])
Weakest (2.1 pages – Werner)
Mandatory Surrender (1.4 pages – Marie-Laure)
**Museum (7.1 pages – von Rumpel)
The Wardrobe (2 pages – Marie-Laure)
Page 183:  Blackbirds (2.5 pages – Werner)
Page 186:  (untitled, duplicate of telephoned telegram)  (1 pages – Marie-Laure)

Bath  (3.5 pages – Marie-Laure)
Weakest (#2) (4.8 pages – Werner)
page 196:  The Arrest of the Locksmith (1.8 pages – Marie-Laure)

Four – 8 August 1944
**Page 201:  The Fort of La Cite  (2.5 pages – von Rumpel)
Atelier de Reparation (1.5 pages – Werner)
Two Cans (1.8 pages – Marie-Laure)
**Page 208:  Number 4 rue Vauborel (1.4 pages – von Rumpel)
What They Have (1.9 pages – Werner)
Trip Wire (1.2 pages – Marie-Laure)

Five – January 1941
Page 217:  January Recess  (7.2 pages – Werner)
He Is Not Coming Back (1.8 pages – Marie-Laure)
Page 227:  Prisoner (2.7 pages – Werner)
Plage du Mole (3.2 pages – Marie-Laure)
**Page 234:  Lapidary (2.3 pages – von Rumpel)
Page 237:  (untitled, uncensored letter from Papa to Marie-Laure)  (1 page)
Entropy (2.3 pages – Werner)
The Rounds (3 pages – Marie-Laure)
Nadel im Heuhaufen (3.5 pages – Werner)
Proposal
You Have Other Friends
Old Ladies Resistance Club
Diagnosis
Weakest (#3)
(letter from Papa, untitled)
Grotto
Intoxicated
The Blade and the Whelk
(untitled letter from Jutta to Werner)
Alive Before You Die
No Out
The Disappearance of Harold Bazin
Everything Poisoned
Visitors
(heavily censored, untitled letter from Werner to Jutta)
The Frog Cooks
Orders
Pneumonia
Page 289: (letter to Marie-Laure from Papa)
Treatments
Heaven
Frederick
Relapse

Six – 8 August 1944
**Page 303:  Someone In The House
The Death of Walter Bernd
Sixth-floor Bedroom
Making the Radio
In The Attic

Seven – August 1942
Page 317:  Prisoners
The Wardrobe
East
One Ordinary Loaf
Volkheimer
Fall
Sunflower
Stones
Grotto
The Messages
Loudenvielle
Gray
Fever
The Third Stone
The Bridge
Rue des Patriarches
White City
Page 372:  Telegram

Eight – 9 August 1944
Page 375:  Fort National
In The Attic
The Heads



Nine – May 1944
Page 397:  Edge of the World
Numbers
May
Hunting (Again)
...
The Arrest of Etienne LeBlanc
Page 432:  7 August 1944
Leaflets

Ten – 12 August 1944
Entombed
Page 443:  Fort National
Captain Nemo's Last Words
Visitor
Final Sentence
Music #1
Music #2
Music #3
Out
Page 461:  Wardrobe
Comrades
The Simultaneity of Instants
Are You There?
The Second Can
Birds of America
Cease-fire
Chocolate
Light

Eleven –  1945
Berlin
Page 492:  Paris

Twelve –  1974

Volkheimer
Page 500:  Jutta
Duffel
Saint-Malo
Laboratory
Visitor
Paper Airplane
The Key
Sea of Flames
Frederick

Thirteen –  2014
Page 527:  (untitled)  She lives to see the century turn.  She lives still.



Friday, December 18, 2015

Mayflower: Courage, Community, and War


  Ten little Indians came together in early 21st Century America to discuss Nathaniel Philbrick’s portrait of our country's birthing in the 17th Century:   “There are two possible responses to a world suddenly gripped by terror and contention. There is the Moseley way: get mad and get even. But as the course of King Philip's War proved, unbridled arrogance and fear only feed the flames of violence. Then there is the (Benjamin) Church way. Instead of killing him, try to bring him around to your way of thinking. First and foremost, treat him like a human being. For Church, success in war was about coercion rather than slaughter, and in this he anticipated the welcoming, transformative beast that eventually became, once the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were in place, the United States.”


Kenny G:  This book had pluses and minuses.  On the plus side, this was an extremely interesting book from an historical view.  This was history I either forgot, or never learned.  The maps were good, not great.  Minuses:  too many tribes, skirmishes, war.  B or B+

Ron B:  I read the first part, as our host instructed.  An interesting book, well written, covered some very interesting history.  A-

Dick Arms:  I found it extremely interesting.  For two years, I lived in this area, looking down on Fall River, all the places in the book.  Great research, the author wrote it well, nicely done.  He could have written two books:  one on Plymouth, and one on King Phillips War.  Good read, went on too long.  A-

Tommy G:  Good history, great deal of research, adequate writing.  I enjoyed the first part and the last part.  55 years before the war was not very interesting.  B+

Dick Jensen:  I enjoyed it a lot, learned a lot.  A-

Keith:  I saw it as revisionist history.  The title is mis-leading as most of the book occurred on land, not on the Mayflower.  One has to read between the lines for the lives of the Pilgrims, and between non-existent lines for the Indians.  I read it as a form like this:  What is the value of history?  Here there were too many facts presented.  The Pilgrims showed up on a wooden ship, prostelize the Indians if they could, killed them if they couldn’t.  The Praying Indians were spies.  Today, through oil companies such as Exxon, Dow Chemical, we are the same way:  Religion is no longer in the mainstream, but money is.  This is a cynical view, but I don’t care.  When the author ran out of facts, he kept on talking.  This would have been a good 200 page book.   B- 

Bob Simon:  I thought that there is so much history, consolidated into grandular portions.  Fascinating for the most part:  people seeking to escape religious freedom, when confronted with survival, became animalistic.  Not unlike [William Golding’s] Lord of the Flies.  The Thanksgiving myth we grew up with was really a story of survival.  If you can’t beat them, subvert them.  A cruel strategy.  I enjoyed the documents presented, e.g., you can read the Mayflower Compact.  Fascinating how they erected this confederacy.  They exploited the Indians.  A-

Rob E:  I thought it should be two books, Mayflower and King Phillips War.  The book was good for me because of the gap between the Mayflower and the first settlers, and 1776.  But too much for this one book.  Philbrick handled Bradford differently from the National Geographic version (Saints & Stringers).  Two civilizations clash, people die.  I was unprepared for the sachem’s head on a pole.  The first part I read, the second part I skimmed, as it was not compelling, to figure out:  B

Jack Ferrell:  There was a line from a song on the radio I heard on the way over tonight that best describes the book:  too little chocolate, too many chores.”  The chocolate was when it talked about “my town” – the chores was the timeline of history.  I found it difficult keeping up with the chores.  B+

Mike: I feel that I learned a great deal from this book.   Were there too many facts, too many Indian names and place names?  Perhaps, but unlike a fiction book, I think I will remember some of these real characters from our nation’s earliest days:   Massasoit, the wise sachem of the Pokanokets; Benjamin Church, the 33-year old carpenter who found he loved the military skirmishes, relished recruiting his own men to include Indian warriors.  And John Howland, the servant who came up to get some fresh air and almost lost his life because of it, yet went on to represent the true American dream:  Servant rises beyond his status to success in the New World.  A-